🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," said one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the state level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to mimic Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global conversation unfolds, the policies of Australia and others indicate that policymakers internationally are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.